How Do Providers Respond to Reference Pricing?
Why This Study Is Important
Prior research has demonstrated that patients respond to the incentives of reference pricing by shifting their demand to providers with lower prices. This study of reference pricing for three types of common surgical procedures explores whether providers respond to this shift in consumer demand by lowering their own prices in a bid to remain competitive.
What This Study Found
- Despite initially pricing below the reference price thresholds in most cases, ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs) showed modest reductions in their prices for colonoscopy, cataract surgery and some types of joint arthroscopy after reference pricing began. ASCs may have been especially responsive to the reference pricing pressures because the targeted procedures constitute a large share of their total patient volume.
- As a group, hospital outpatient departments (HOPDs) did not reduce their mean prices in response to demand shifts arising from reference pricing. However, HOPDs whose colonoscopy prices began above the reference price threshold did reduce their price for that procedure after reference pricing was implemented.
- There was no evidence that providers responded to the changing incentives by lowering prices only for patients facing reference pricing. Rather, over 75 percent of the provider price reductions accrued to the insurer’s non-CalPERS population.
- There also was no evidence that providers attempted to compensate for lower facility prices by raising other fees, by charging higher prices to other insurers for these services or by letting quality decline.
What These Findings Mean
Reference pricing for common, non-emergent procedures whose quality is comparable across providers can be an effective strategy for steering patients to lower-priced providers. This study shows that there may also be supply-side impacts as some providers lower their prices in response to shifting demand. Together, these findings suggest that reference pricing could help to moderate health care spending through two avenues. At the same time, the provider price responses documented here were modest, and few payers have the purchasing power of CalPERS. Significant changes in provider pricing behavior in response to reference pricing are unlikely unless these programs are coordinated across many large employers and purchasers.
More About This Study
This study uses 2009-2013 claims data from a large insurer that began administering a reference pricing program for colonoscopy, cataract surgery, and joint arthroscopy in 2012 for people receiving health benefits through the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS). The claims data were used to determine the negotiated prices paid to each provider, and market areas were characterized by the extent to which the local commercially insured population was exposed to the CalPERS reference pricing program. Providers in markets with higher exposure are expected to be more responsive to the program’s incentives. Difference-in-difference modeling was used to estimate the post-reference pricing change in providers’ negotiated prices as a function of market exposure, with non-CalPERS patients insured by this carrier serving as the control group. A similar triple difference model was estimated to differentiate pricing responses based on whether the provider’s baseline price was above or below the reference price threshold. Results are robust across a number of alternative specifications.
Whaley CM and Brown TT. “Firm Responses to Targeted Consumer Incentives: Evidence from Reference Pricing for Surgical Services.” Journal of Health Economics, 61:111-33. July 2018.
For more information about the NIHCM Foundation Investigator-Initiated Research Grant Program, contact Dr. Julie Schoenman at 202-296-4426.